|
Post by the_uprising on Sept 8, 2006 16:59:31 GMT -5
So back to asumptions.... As far as i can tell, i my first pictorial would be correct in having both a bass and a treble working simultaneously with a single output. Assuming that it is correct (which i am certainly open for being corrected), there would be no problem in having a concentric pot wired as is below, in the second pictorial, would there? The only other question that i would have for this particular thread would be: is there any other way to have a bass/treble working simultaneously that may be more efficient and/or beneficial? I am looking for some high school style peer editing here everyone... So thanks for reading. Sorry if its a little wide for some of your moniters...
|
|
|
Post by spitfire23bc on Sept 9, 2006 16:39:08 GMT -5
Hey, the_uprising As it happens, I've just done a similar thing to my strat. I don't know if your design would work - I'm not quite gifted enough to work that out, but what I've done seems to function OK. I'm not sure what a "treble by-pass" is. If it's the same as a "bass-cut" (ie: like the stock treble-cut, but for bass frequencies), then hopefully this will help... (I can't claim to have created it - those kudos go to my dad!) I've only just installed this mod, so I haven't had time to fully work out whether or not it's a useful thing to do, but it does have a significant effect. The diagram is for three ordinary pots, rather than using a dual-concentric.
|
|