Post by antigua on Mar 4, 2017 17:57:47 GMT -5
These humbuckers come stock in many Epiphone guitars, including the Les Paul and and Dot. The poor reviews of these pickups no doubt fuel many aftermarket pickup purchases. I've bought a set off eBay in order to analyze them and determine how they compare to the new Epiphone Probuckers and or the Gibson 57 Classic. I did a comparison of those pickups here guitarnuts2.proboards.com/thread/7748/gibson-classic-stock-epiphone-humbucker , and I'll post some of those measurements below in order to more easily contrast them.
Electrical Measurements
Epiphone 57CH "Bridge"
- DC Resistance: 8.75K ohms
- Measured L: 4.972H
- Calculated C: 101pF (111 - 10)
- Gauss: 190G screw, 190G slug
Bridge unloaded: dV: -1.9dB f: 6.66kHz (black)
Bridge loaded (200k & 470pF): dV: -1.6dB f: 2.50kHz (red)
Epiphone 57CH Neck
- DC Resistance: 8.77K ohms
- Measured L: 4.972H
- Calculated C: 105pF (115 - 10)
- Gauss: 260G screw, 250G slug
Neck unloaded: dV: -2.1dB f: 6.89kHz (green)
Neck loaded (200k & 470pF): dV: -1.6dB f: 2.50kHz (gray)
Apparently the two pickups I received have near identical electrical measures. One pickup has a sticker indicating that it's a neck pickup, but the other has no sticker. it wouldn't surprise me if they actually sent me two "neck" pickups. I know that there also exists a "HOTCH", or "hot classic humbucker" with a DC resistance around 14k. Even without a HOTCH to test, the neck pickup is representative enough to compare to other Gibson / Epiphone pickups.
Bode Plots
The 57 Classic neck, Probucker 2 and the 57CH all have loaded (470pF parallel) peaks around 2.5kHz, so they are similar in terms LC resonance. Where they really differ is in the quality of the covers. The CH57 uses a cheap brass cover, where as the 57 Classis and the PB2 use nickel silver. Notice in the plot below how the frequency where the inductance losses out to capacitance is about the same for all three models, around 2.5kHz with a chosen 470pF parallel load. But that while the Classic 57 and PB2 has a mostly flat response and mild boost at the resonance, the 57CH drops off almost right away, and with load, has no resonant peak (no Q factor).
Gibson 57 Classic and Epiphone Probucker 2:
Here is how the 57CH performs with the cover removed:
The taller peaks show a higher Q factor as a result of having removed the covers, which cause eddy currents.
The loaded (200k parallel resistance) uncovered peak of the 57CH is similar to the 57 Classic below (gray line in both plots). The 57CH has a much higher unloaded Q factor (green line in both plots) than the 57 Classic, which is interesting, and might say something about the quality of steel used for the screws and pole pieces, but since a pickup is almost always used with tone and volume pots, the unloaded characteristics (meaning no tone or volume pots in parallel) aren't all that meaningful to the tone.
Gibson 57 Classic, with and without cover:
That dramatic roll off of high end seen with the 57CH isn't by itself a bad thing. A Filter'tron has a very similar roll off due to the thick filister screws used, but the difference there is that a loaded Filter'tron has a resonant peak close to 5kHz, where as a PAFs tend to roll off around 2.5kHz. It's the combination of that low peak frequency and high eddy current attenuation that makes a 57CH trend muddy, while a Filter'tron is heard as being bright and clear.
Base Plates
It can also be seen that the 57CH have brass base plates instead of nickel silver, and the Gibson 57 and Probucker 2 have, but I've previously studied that and found it to be almost entirely irrelevant guitarnuts2.proboards.com/thread/7861/humbucker-base-plates-eddy-currents
Wax Potting
It can be seen here that the CH57 has a lot of wax, and I've seen opinions out there that this wax must be detrimental to the tone. To the extent that microphonics are desirable, that is it true, but it should be noted that many (maybe most) premium pickups have a similar amount of wax in them, for example, this DiMarzio Air Classic looks similarly submerged:
Under the Hood
Unlike the Gibson 57 Classic and the PB2, the CH57 uses plastic spacers instead of maple (or Asian mystery wood).
There are a few other "made in China" characteristics that differ from most domestic PAF knock offs; the hookup wire enters on the same side as the where the coil connections are made, necessitating two spacers instead of one. The screws have smooth, unthreaded ends, and of course the use of brass metals in place of nickel silver.
The Probucker is a combination of domestic and Chinese attention to detail, it uses wood spacers and nickel silver, but the lead wire enters at the connection end, so it too has two wood spacers to fill the voids instead of one. The mechanical drawback to having the wire enter at the side where the connection is made is that the solder joint is slightly more susceptible to pulling and breaking, since the length of the pickup is not serving to secure the hookup wire.
Gibson 57 Classic and PB2; notice the spacers and where the wire enters the base plates, as well the fact that the base plates are silver in appearance, rather than brass / yellow in color.
Hookup Cable
Another thing that sets the 57CH apart from a 57 Classic is the insulated hookup wire. I disconnected the hookup wire from the coil to get a measurement, and found that the 57CH has just shy of twice as much capacitance as the vintage style hookup wire at 129pF:
A good guitar cable has around 30pF capacitance per foot, and the lower value helps maintain a resonant peak that delivers good treble clarity. These smaller hookup cables show higher capacitance because the shielding layer is much closer to the inner lead wire. The thicker construction of a guitar cable is a big reason they have lower capacitance. Therefore, the Gibson vintage style hookup wire is equivalent to about 2 1/2 feet of guitar cable for every 1 foot, while the Epiphone CH57 hookup wire is closer to 4 feet of guitar cable for every 1 foot.
If this same lower grade of wire is also used for the run from the tone controls to the selector switch in a Les Paul, that might represent an additional two feet of wiring with this especially high capacitance. If two feet of this grade of wire is like eight feet of guitar cable, then it's like you've added eight feet to your guitar cable and have nothing to show for it, tonewise. If you value treble clarity, it might be a good idea to replace the wiring in an Epiphone Les Paul with a lower capacitance shielded hookup wire.
The real problem with having this much capacitance between the volume pot and the pickup by virtue of intrinsic coil capacitance and hookup wire capacitance is that, the volume knob is wired as a voltage divider, and as such, when you turn down the volume, the cable capacitance is actually removed from the pickup, improving the brightness a little bit. If you have a lot of capacitance within the pickup, or between the pickup and the volume knob, this capacitance is always there even when you turn down the volume, causing the pickup to become especially dark as you roll back on the volume.
In Conclusion
Based on the evidence, it looks like the most likely reason the 57CH gets bad reviews compared to other PAF knock offs is 1) the brass cover damping the high end response, and 2) the hookup wire of not only the pickup, but probably the Epiphones they come in, adding a large amount of capacitance, further reducing the high end.
I also believe that the inclusion of a "HOTCH" 14k DC resistance pickup in stock Epiphone Les Pauls also contribute to a poor view of Epiphones, because Gibsons generally do not have such a hot pickup in the bridge, and it's not a bad thing if you play with high gain and like pickups such as a "JB", but if you want a good clean bridge tone, a "HOTCH" bridge pickup is probably heard as detrimental to the overall tone of the guitar.