|
|
Post by RandomHero on Jun 29, 2005 9:54:19 GMT -5
The more I read about these things, the more I like them. I often find myself simply not using a lot of the models or presets on my V-Amp, and popular opinion seems to be that the V-Amp is craip anyway. The Roland seems to be a no-frills modeling amp that retains a good deal of diversity... I've watched demos and listened to soundbytes and it sounds like it might be my choice for my next up amp. Anyone else have any words of experience with this amp?
|
|
|
|
Post by RJB on Jun 30, 2005 8:45:08 GMT -5
My experience is with the Cube 15, the little brother. The metal stack setting is really great. The clean is good, and the overdrive mode was pretty creamy. The one place it lacked, and the reason I didn't buy it is I found I couldn't get the "just a little clipping please" setting real easy. Think country Twang, Rockabilly kind of stuff. This being the sound I live with mostly.
|
|
|
|
Post by erikh on Jun 30, 2005 8:49:35 GMT -5
I tried both the 15 and 30. Not too bad actually. I'd consider the 30 but I'm really looking for a low wattage good sounding tube amp.
|
|
prshott
Apprentice Shielder
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
|
Post by prshott on Oct 14, 2006 0:51:50 GMT -5
I have a roland micro cube that I swear will peel paint off the wall, I also would like to get the cube 60 but heard they are difficult to play at low volumes.
|
|
|
|
Post by ccso8462 on Oct 16, 2006 16:40:01 GMT -5
I had a micro-cube but traded it in on a PODxt. Loved the overdrive sounds, but there was very low output on the JC120 setting, and I needed to be able to switch from clean to dirty without fooling with the output. Since it is the bigger and better version, I expect the 60 would have the same great tones with a lot more versatility. If you play much clean stuff, check out the JC120 setting and see if it gets loud enough for your needs.
Carl
|
|
