|
Post by 1953sbaalto on May 8, 2008 14:29:38 GMT -5
The jumper is there (I believe), just got smushed with the poor scan. I'll check the other lead tonight, but with the jumper, connected to either terminal should be the same, right?
Yeah, looking at the original hard copy, its there, just kind of close to the terminal and a little faint...scanner trouble...will check the other lead tonight.
|
|
|
Post by 1953sbaalto on May 8, 2008 17:16:15 GMT -5
so i checked, there was something goofy in that area, but now corrected it to match MR's drawing. The lead coming off of hte tone pot was shifted 1 terminal over.
Rechecked resistance values: Down:Same as before (Good)
Up: 1) 4.75 2) 4.75 3) 9.53 4) 9.53 5)17.28
downloaded some freebie software for electrical schematics, will try to make a "neater" schematic at some point this evening.
~Jon
p.s. thanks for all your help, i know i'm a thick mechanical guy...
|
|
|
Post by ChrisK on May 8, 2008 18:21:11 GMT -5
?The switch on the volume pot?
Up: 1N) 4.75 (neck only, s/b about 35K) 2) 4.75 (neck only, s/b about 15K) 3) 9.53 (middle only, s/b about 23K) 4) 9.53 (middle only, s/b about 30K) 5B)17.28 (?/, s/b 1/[1/20K + 1/10K + 1/5k] or about 2K85)
|
|
|
Post by 1953sbaalto on May 8, 2008 20:07:01 GMT -5
yeah, that lead on on the volume switch...
|
|
|
Post by 1953sbaalto on May 11, 2008 18:53:48 GMT -5
its aliiiivvveee!!!
I feel sorry for the neighbors. Thanks everyone.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisK on May 11, 2008 18:58:37 GMT -5
Oh gosh, what have we done?
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on May 12, 2008 19:01:59 GMT -5
its aliiiivvveee!!!
I feel sorry for the neighbors. Thanks everyone. Oh gosh, what have we done? QUICK! Call the Risk Management Team - we gotta spray for lawsuits!
|
|