|
Post by newey on Apr 23, 2009 19:38:49 GMT -5
Here's an interesting video bit of lutherie- Guy plays an Oud he made out of a dresser drawer.
|
|
|
Post by lpf3 on Apr 23, 2009 21:01:40 GMT -5
Now there's a nut that would fit right in around here.....he plays it pretty well too. And he can use it to bring a change of clothes to his gigs. -lpf3
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 24, 2009 11:42:40 GMT -5
So...if you used a bigger drawer...and two necks to it...would that make it a Duo Oud
Happy Trails
Cynical One
|
|
|
Post by newey on Apr 24, 2009 12:16:10 GMT -5
Ha!
He also has a real Oud sitting on the couch behind him. If he put the homebuilt one next to it, he'd have "The Oud Couple". ;D
(insert chorus of groans here . . .)
|
|
|
Post by D2o on Apr 24, 2009 12:24:10 GMT -5
Ha! He also has a real Oud sitting on the couch behind him. If he put the homebuilt one next to it, he'd have "The Oud Couple". ;D (insert chorus of groans here . . .) No, no - all this play on words is actually becoming oudles of fun. Newey ... say, isn't that an oud(?) in your avatar?
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 24, 2009 13:05:29 GMT -5
No, no - all this play on words is actually becoming oudles of fun. Well, I wanted to be the the first one in...didn't want to be the oud man out...
|
|
|
Post by D2o on Apr 24, 2009 13:09:48 GMT -5
If we can keep our jokes clean, that w oud be g oud ... nothing l oud or lascivious.
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 24, 2009 13:44:15 GMT -5
If we can keep our jokes clean, that w oud be g oud ... nothing l oud or lascivious. ...sounds a bit pr oudish to me...but, OK...don't want to find myself on the oudside looking in...
|
|
|
Post by D2o on Apr 24, 2009 14:30:24 GMT -5
Thanks, doud!
So, this all begs the obvious question of which types of woud drawers are the best tonewoud.
Shoud I stick with my own drawers, or shoud I try to get into my wife's drawers?
D2o
P.S. dang, my innuendo is not exempt ... I thought I wrote loud "AND" lascivious. Turns out I wrote "OR" ...
... it may not be loud, but it's lascivious!
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Apr 24, 2009 14:35:24 GMT -5
Youse guys realize, doncha, that ChrisK's patent-applied-for "aboot" has just become an endangered species......
|
|
|
Post by newey on Apr 24, 2009 14:38:13 GMT -5
So, we're back to that again? There oud to be a law . . . Unfortunately, I can't now change my avatar since all the posts dissing it would then make no sense!
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 24, 2009 15:21:06 GMT -5
So, we're back to that again? There oud to be a law . . . I think it would be more of an oudinance, rather then a law... Happy Trails Cynical One
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Apr 24, 2009 15:46:43 GMT -5
So, we're back to that again? There oud to be a law . . .
I think it would be more of an oudinance, rather then a law...
Yes, of course. But will the oudience listen and obey?
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 24, 2009 15:57:51 GMT -5
I think it would be more of an oudinance, rather then a law...
Yes, of course. But will the oudience listen and obey? ...only if they felt oudbligated...
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Apr 24, 2009 22:29:01 GMT -5
...only if they felt oudbligated... Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Awww, there's a flag on the play! Sorry, but you used two consonants back-to-back - not allowed. Johnny, please tell our contestant what he's won as a consolation prize. ........ Next contestant, please! (But you do get a Gold Star for sneaking in a palindrome. )
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 24, 2009 23:39:07 GMT -5
(But you do get a Gold Star for sneaking in a palindrome. ) ...and my Mom heard Glenn Miller play "In the M oud" at the Palindrome years ago...she probably snuck in too...
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Apr 25, 2009 15:29:13 GMT -5
Ye Gawds, that was oudrageous! Good too. OK, you're back out of the penalty box. (Although I've now committed the very same cyn, so I guess I better go talk to Johnny. )
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 25, 2009 19:14:34 GMT -5
Well, I'm glad to be back in the fine graces of the more eroudite members here.
And don't worry about committing the same cyn...it's barely oudible to the naked ear.
I do have to wonder how long this plenitoud of clever banter can be continoud?
Happy Trails
Cynical One
|
|
|
Post by JohnH on Apr 25, 2009 19:15:34 GMT -5
According to the Dr Who section of Wikipedia, the 'Oud', or more correctly spelt 'Ood', are a race of squid faced aliens: Ood Type Squid-faced humanoids Affiliated with Second Great and Bountiful Human Empire Home planet Ood Sphere: Horsehead Nebula First appearance "The Impossible Planet" The Ood are a humanoid species with coleoid tentacles on the lower portions of their faces. In the distant future (circa 42nd century), the Ood are a slave race to humanity, performing menial tasks, and it is claimed that every human has an Ood servant. According to human characters in their first appearance, the Ood offer themselves for servitude willingly, having no goals of their own except to be given orders and to serve. It is also claimed that they cannot look after themselves, and if they do not receive orders, they pine away and die. However, mention is made of a group called the "Friends of the Ood" who are apparently lobbying for Ood freedom.
read more here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Doctor_Who_monsters_and_aliensMeanwhile, back to the Youtube clip on the first post - One would have to try playing 'Kashmir' on that thing! John
|
|
|
Post by cynical1 on Apr 25, 2009 19:20:02 GMT -5
According to the Dr Who section of Wikipedia, the 'Oud', or more correctly spelt 'Ood', are a race of squid faced aliens: ...don't take this the wrong way, JohnH...but you really need to get oud of the house more often... Happy Trails Cynical One
|
|
|
Post by newey on Apr 25, 2009 20:06:50 GMT -5
. . . . . . .is my new favorite band name!
|
|
|
Post by JohnH on Apr 25, 2009 21:06:55 GMT -5
According to the Dr Who section of Wikipedia, the 'Oud', or more correctly spelt 'Ood', are a race of squid faced aliens: ...don't take this the wrong way, JohnH...but you really need to get oud of the house more often... Happy Trails Cynical One You are so right d oud! - its a fine day outside, and Im spending my weekend putting resistors to pad the inputs of that old mixer we discussed recently. BTW, I got it going with the band last week, and it worked great with 6 mics, keys and a direct-in, but just about everything had to be set for minimum gain to avoid channel clipping. I guess 1980 when it was built was a quieter gentler time (I dont remember it that way though) John
|
|