|
Post by stevewf on Jul 1, 2023 23:40:06 GMT -5
Poking around at retailers' websites, we're offered various pot tapers and resistance values, and "no-load" pots. But which ones to use in what circuits? Let's get some terminology in common, to begin with. I'll type in some assertions; please post any needed corrections! - "Audio" tapers are also called "Logarithmic".
- "Reverse-Audio" tapers are graphically mirror-image counterparts of the "Audio" ones
- "Linear" tapers' graphs are symmetrical
- "Other" tapers are less commonly used inside guitars, and could considered on a type-by-type basis
- Aside from taper, there are "No-Load" pots whose resistive tracks don't bright the two outer terminals
- There are many Values of pots, a few of which are commonly used in passive guitars, and others in active guitars
I'm only familiar with passive guitar systems, so I hope to focus on that for now. The title of the thread asks for insights. There's always the "Do what sounds right to you!" (and rightly so), but I bet wisdom of some can save time of others. So, are there rules of thumb? Here's an example though experience: I have a gitbox with a series/parallel switch. It has a knob for lowering the signal the South coil. For series mode, I ended up using an Audio taper for shorting the coil, while in parallel mode there's a Reverse-Audio pot for choking that same coil (the single knob controls a dual-gang pot). I also decided to cut the resistive track to make them "No-Load". It sounds right to me now. But I bumbled around to get there. For instance, I first tried a regular Audio taper for the parallel setting, and I got all the action at one extreme end of the knob's rotation. Had I known, maybe I wouldn't have this little soldering iron burn mark on my thumb right now... So, any Rules of Thumb?
|
|