|
Post by RandomHero on Sept 14, 2006 7:05:18 GMT -5
Anyone here who plays a 7-string, or at least a guitar tuned much farther down than C, will understand that finding that perfectly intoned sweet spot on a .58+ string is next to impossible. I thought I might submit the query to the old and wise on the forum. =)
On my Ibanez, I tune my top down to A, with the standard six strings in standard tuning. As I draw the saddle back, there approaches a point at within 1/8th of the extent of its' backward travel that it seems to get as good as it gets, as far as the 12th fretted/12th harmonic method goes. Much farther back than that, however, and the problem equation seems to reverse itself; not only does the intonation slide back out as if you were returning the saddle toward the nut, but -all- positions on the fretboard lose their relativity to the notes on the rest of the neck! I imagine it causes problems akin to those you might encounter if you put a 24.75" scale neck on a body routed for a 25.5" scale...
To my understanding, no guitar can be perfectly intonated. Unless you want to do a lot of math and design a guitar with a compensated nut, bridge, and even compensated frets, for use in -one- tuning with -one- set of string guages, you're stuck with the "move the saddle to average out the scale length over the fretboard" patch-up attempt at intonation.
I know I'm running headfirst into the laws of physics by expecting a .58 to vibrate at 110 hz, and be intonated as well as everything else on the 25.5" scale, but -why- exactly can't I get it as close to perfect as I can the rest of the strings?
|
|
|
Post by ccoleman on Sept 14, 2006 11:41:57 GMT -5
I would take a wild guess and say that , as long as you are using a low action, and your frets are in good shape, you might have more accurate results with a bigger string guage.... because with your .58 A tuned so low to 110 Hz, the tension is relatively slack, so the amount of uptune due to fretting a note is more than with a thicker guage string.. I would try a .65.. just taking a stab at it..
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Sept 14, 2006 15:14:40 GMT -5
RH and cc, I'd take more of a stab at calculating the proper gauge for 55Hz, not 110Hz. The low E on a guitar is 82Hz (give or take a few centimes), and the low E on a bass guitar is 41Hz. I could show the math, and gunk up this post , but the shortcut to the answer for this is easy - just use a bass guitar's standard A string, and be done with it. You might consider going as light in gauge as what would ordinarily be a D string, 0.065", but that might be a bit floppy. And your discussion above misses a crucial point: the problem lays in the deflection of the string as you depress it to a fret. At that point, the string length and tension have both changed somewhat, and the bigger the string diameter, the more noticible the discrepancy. This is one of the reasons for a longer scale on the bass, to reduce this problem to the level of what's usually encountered on the guitar. HTH sumgai
|
|
|
Post by RandomHero on Sept 14, 2006 18:49:43 GMT -5
According to the String Tension Calculator, I would need a 0.070" to tune to 55Hz and keep the tension uniform with the other Regular Slinky strings. This has me hesitant though, because that is irreversible nut slot filing...
I used to run a .65 on my Schecter with a Floyd, and it worked pretty well. But with the locking nut, I could change string guages all the time and never have to permanently alter anything.
|
|
|
Post by RandomHero on Sept 17, 2006 18:27:32 GMT -5
The .065 works like a charm. Know what's difficult though? Removing the little brass ball-end from a bass string, and re-inserting a standard guitar string ball-end. I'm gonna have to install a bass string ferrule on the back for the low A.
|
|
|
Post by ccoleman on Sept 17, 2006 23:41:05 GMT -5
Bingo. This is awesome. Glad we could help, RandomHero.
|
|