|
Post by Ripper on May 24, 2006 12:47:22 GMT -5
Hey gang... ( Thats very Scoobi-Doo'ish I know ) Lets keep this hush- hush okay? My lovely lady bought me a beautiful accoustic guitar for my birthday a few years back. Its a Washburn EA18 Its got an ash body and top and is a gorgeous candy apple red showing the wood pattern underneath. Its a work of art to look at honestly...trouble is... It sounds horrible! It sounds much better plugged in, but to play as an accoustic it sounds dead. Not much tone at all. I cherish the guitar. It even has her name on the truss rod cover. Id never part with it. Does anyone know anything about these guitars?...or any suggestion? ...Sumgai please dont suggest the wood chipper!
|
|
|
Post by ux4484 on May 24, 2006 15:34:26 GMT -5
Whoa.... Strangely similar to what my Mrs. got me for Xmas: a Yamaha APX5A, which is also a "thinline" acoustic/electric. I've discovered two things about mine. 1) Sounds better without a pick 2) Don't expect it to be a regular acoustic (plays like one, just doesn't sound like one). It has decent tone, but with the smaller (shallower) body, it just doesn't come across with that small a cavity. Instead of poor tone, I'd say it's poor resonance. If the tone was truly bad, it would sound poor amplified. Like yours, it also sounds better amplified. What I like about it; is that being thinline it's not so far out from my body to play (being a rather large guy ) like my old Maderia dreadnought. It's probably not what I would have picked out for myself, but like you it's dear to me because it's from her, and she took the time to get me something special. Having a smaller body it is easier to carry around (even in it's case) and has since become my #1 played guitar. I hammer it out on the Yamaha, and then finish up with the appropriate "other" guitar.
|
|
|
Post by Ripper on May 24, 2006 21:28:16 GMT -5
Thanks ux4484...
I guess youre right. Its a pretty shallow body. Ill keep it plugged in with a little chorus!
|
|
vjmodman
Rookie Solder Flinger
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
|
Post by vjmodman on May 25, 2006 9:08:07 GMT -5
In my experience ( I own a takamine EG560 thin line guitar) use bright strings and play some fingerstyle, plugged in if you can. Thats what sounds good on these guitars.
|
|
|
Post by Runewalker on May 27, 2006 11:08:57 GMT -5
Deep:
I almost hesitate weighing in on this knowing your religious devotion to the notion of wood and tone, howerver there is one hint about your description that suggests why the thing is dead unplugged. "Its got an ash body and top....."
Ash is a hardwood. Most "resonant" acoustic tops are made of solid carved or planed clear grained Spruce or Cedar, which are "soft"woods.
So if you see ash, or mahagony, or those maple flametops on and acoustic, these are done to drew customers in on appearance. They are unlikely to be solid hardwoods, and are most probably laminated thin plywood with a hardwood veneer top. If it was a solid hardwood it would be significantly less resoponsive, but more reflective than spruce. Amplfy that same comment when applied to laminates. Imagine a top of formica.
The thinline structuire then exacerbates the dead projective qualities as it has less amplifying capacity in its chamber. In acoustics resonance is a desired quality. (see how I avoid mentioning it as a detractive quality in solid bodies?).
This does not mean it's "bad." In fact those same principals are what make it in many ways superior when amplifed to a large box resonant acoustic that sounds good acoustically, but boomy when amplified.
One reason the jazzers in the fifties took to the Gibson ES-175, (even though it was the economy line compared to the premium carved top solid wood L-5) was that the laminated top was stiffer and more stable when amplified (less body resonance feedback).
BB King used to stuff rags in his 335s and 355s until Gibson made him a 355 with no f holes.
So what the SigOther has done is given you a better amplified instrument. And enhansed your masculinity. Afterall, arn't acoustics for girl folk singers/
Yours, RWZ
|
|
|
Post by Ripper on May 28, 2006 22:36:49 GMT -5
Thanks Runewalker... You are right... My 12 string is cedar and it sings. Ya Ya I know a 12 string will sing anyway due to 6 more strings, but you can tell that the ash just isnt right for the guitar. Its all show and no go. Ill just keep it to play when I get ideas or when I feel like plugging in for a while. acoustics may just be for girls I dont know, im secure in my masculinity! ;D ....having said that I do get compliments on how nice looking my hands are! I feel so cheap!
|
|
|
Post by Runewalker on May 28, 2006 23:26:52 GMT -5
acoustics may just be for girls I dont know, im secure in my masculinity! ;D ....having said that I compliments on how nice looking my hands are! I feel so cheap! :'( Deep, I understand how it helps in fingerpicking those acoustics, but how do you fret the strings with those designer 1.5" nails?
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on May 29, 2006 5:30:50 GMT -5
deep, No, the chipper is not the obvious solution here. ;D As Rune has said, the top of your guitar may not be of prime-time stuff. I'd suggest that you take it to a quality luthier, and have him or her look inside with one of their special mirrors. They can then tell you what kind of wood for sure, and how it's braced. Bracing can greatly affect the tonal quality (particularly resonance), and so can the way the bridge is attached. Try to get an opinion on that topic, too. Since you're serious about keeping this guitar, ask for bids on what it would take to make things right, whether it be fixing the bracing, or even outright replacing the top. You may be dismayed, or you may be pleasantly surprized, but you won't know until you ask, right? sumgai
|
|
|
Post by mlrpa on May 29, 2006 14:44:42 GMT -5
If by dead, you mean lacking brightness, try replacing the plastic nut and saddle with bone, or perhaps brass. Better resonence than soft plastic.
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jun 30, 2010 23:09:45 GMT -5
or .... just play it amplified , and buy a sweet sounding acoustic
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jun 30, 2010 23:44:11 GMT -5
i have played some FINE sounding acoustics with Ash , Maple , or even Laminated tops ...
you do not have to have a solid Spruce or Cedar top to get sweet acoustic tone , and awesome projection.
if the guitar is designed and built properly , it will sound great acoustically with a solid flamed , birds eye , quilted , spalted , etc , maple top.
and there are shallow body acoustics that have full , deep tone that project well ... even with * gasp * a laminated top ! ... and wait for it .... here it comes .... there are even Korean and Chinese acoustics that sound GREAT ! ... yes , i said it .... so let the fainting begin ;D
.... and yes , there are plenty of crappy , thin sounding guitars with laminated tops , maple tops , ash tops , etc ...... the right strings will make an amazing difference on a shallow bodied guitar .... heck , the right strings can make an amazing difference on a deep bodied guitar.
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jun 30, 2010 23:46:14 GMT -5
and i dont know about you folks , but i am VERY impressed with myself for not making any jokes about the poor guys who suffer from dead wood ;D
|
|