|
Post by frets on Sept 2, 2019 18:50:26 GMT -5
Dear Fellow Friends, I understand Series lo pass, hi pass; but, will embarrassilngly (sic) admit that when a resistor is between the legs, parallel or “tanked”, how does one determine the frequency effect of the relationship in terms of tone? I’m probably not correctly asking this question, but I have no idea how to calculate the effect of that certain ohm, kilo, Meg + cap on “tone”. Thanks
|
|
axedoctor
Meter Reader 1st Class
Expert in-Training
Posts: 74
Likes: 9
|
Post by axedoctor on Sept 2, 2019 20:34:59 GMT -5
not totally sure what you're asking, but connecting a resistor and capacitor as described will form an impedance that is the parallel combination of the frequency-independent resistance R and the frequency-dependent reactance 2piFC which is the product of these two factors divided by their sum
if this resistor is placed across the capacitor in a typical treble tone circuit, then it seems to me that the result would be an overall reduction in maximum achievable pickup volume plus a faster high frequency rolloff as the potentiometer value is decreased
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Sept 2, 2019 23:21:49 GMT -5
..... connecting a resistor and capacitor as described will form an impedance that is the parallel combination of the frequency-independent resistance R and the frequency-dependent reactance 1 / 2piFC which is the product of these two factors divided by their sum Fixed the forgotten inversion. The formulas is spoken as "one over two times pi times frequency times capacitance". Without that inversion, higher frequencies would have a more difficult time getting through a cap, instead of having an easier time, as we see in the real world.
One question though: Is this question about Tone controls (in the form of a standard treble roll-off), or treble-bleed circuits incorporated with Volume controls?
sumgai
|
|
|
Post by frets on Sept 3, 2019 1:14:00 GMT -5
Sumgai, No this is not specific to treble bleeds; however, they would be included. Let me use an example. A typical Midrange Push Pull utilizes a resistor/cap combo of 270k/.039uF on 4 with a .001 or .002uF coupled with a 1meg or 1.1 meg resistor. Why these values? Or, more simply, the Rothstein. I’ve seen numerous push pull three way tone controls that have various resistor values in parallel with their capacitor. Again, how does this equate to a particular tone frequency? In other words, how is the combination determined? Thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2019 4:22:10 GMT -5
XC = 1 / (2 × π × f × C) XL = 2 × π × f × L L being a Inductor (Transformer or PICKUP!) Really need to find you a Electronics book/webpage i had two books by R.A.Penfold when doing Electronics.. ill try and find the books on Amazon but they keep changing the cover! 1/((1/R)+(1/XC)) reading the title there C in between the legs or R! Para R+XC Would be the Tone Cap BUT!! Resistor is in 1x10^3 for Kilo and 1x10^6 for Mega Capacitor is in 1x10^-9 for Nano dont really do Micro and Pico for tone caps Beginners-Guide-Modern-Electronic-Componentsi did think the other book was called Advanced Guide Modern Electronic Components! but i cant find it was a dam thick book (twice the size of the first one) and used to be YELLOW 1x10^3 = K 1x10^6 = M 1x10^9 = G 1x10^12 = T 1x10^-3 = m 1x10^-6 = u 1x10^-9 = n 1x10^-12 = p as capacitors move lower resistors move higher and remember to keep it at one value
|
|
|
Post by frets on Sept 3, 2019 14:43:21 GMT -5
Thanks to all. Quite a bit out of my league; but, I will continue to research with the answers given. If any of you know of an online calculator that computes a value relative to frequency changes in tone with resistors parallel to caps, would be appreciated. That’s about my level of engineering abilities - zilch. I see various combinations of resistor values in tandem with cap values in the RLC and wonder how the value was selected to reach a tone or rather, frequency result. Stupid simple for me.
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Sept 3, 2019 22:37:19 GMT -5
frets, ange threw at you a lot of beginner's AC theory, so don't feel ashamed that some of it didn't stick the first time around. I have a couple of web pages bookmarked in my folder, but first, I wanna see if this link does any good for you. It goes to a speradsheet made by our very own JohnH, and he's been improving it for more than 10 years now - it's meant for guitarists specifically, yet it's easy to use, nearly all of the instructions are right on the page(s) you are intersted in. Try this on for size, and see if it answers your questions. If not, let me/us know, right back here in this thread. JohnH's Guitar Frequency Response CalculatorGood luck! sumgai
|
|
|
Post by frets on Sept 4, 2019 21:16:42 GMT -5
Sumgai, John’s spreadsheet program is a thing of beauty and does immensely help with my inquiry...all thanks.
|
|
|
Post by sumgai on Sept 5, 2019 10:10:51 GMT -5
frets, Don't thank me, I was only the messenger. Thank John for taking the time to develop this idea from not much more than scraps of conversations he particpated in, over the years. Glad it's working out for you, but again - don't hesitate to ask questions. Either here in this thread, or start another that might be more specific... it's all good! sumgai
|
|